Re-print payments

Arbor Finance Printing uses pop-ups. Ensure your browser does not block pop-ups from the Arbor Finance website. Click here for details.

In the Re-print payments screen, you can reprint a cheque for a payment made within the past year from today's date. No details are updated and the cheque number remains the same.

This can be useful if a replacement cheque needs to be issued following a loss or printer malfunction.

  1. From the Transactions menu choose Payments.
  2. Click the Re-print payments tab.
    Under Printed Payments, all printed cheque entries in the system are listed for the past year from today's date.
    Where multiple payments to the same supplier have been consolidated in a cheque, only a single line is displayed in the Printed Payments list.Screenshot 2024-08-13 at 14.31.24.png
    1. Under 'Search for printed payments', you can enter the Supplier code, Date printed or Cheque number to help locate the printed payment you want. Note that cheques can only be re-printed if they are less than one year old.

    2. Click Search. (If you want to start a different search, click the Clear icon to reset the search fields.) 

    3. Select the payment you want to reprint, by setting its toggle switch to Yes

      You can select more than one payment if required.

    4. Click Re-print payments.

      A preview of the cheque(s) ready for printing is displayed in the report viewer. If you are happy with the preview, print the cheques. 

    5. Verify that the cheques have printed correctly.

      (If they have not, you may want to change the cheque layout: see Cheque remittance.)

    6. Go back to the Print payments screen, where a confirmation pop-up is displayed.Screenshot 2024-08-13 at 14.32.03.png

      • Select No if the cheque(s) has not printed correctly. The chosen payments are still selected and you can attempt to print again.

      • Select Yes to close the pop-up.  All selected lines are reset to "No"

Was this article helpful?
0 out of 0 found this helpful
I'm still stuck!

Comments

0 comments

Article is closed for comments.